Trustworthy-ML-Lab/Agent-Cold-Start-Safety-Gap: Are tool-calling LLM agents equally safe throughout a conversation? We discover they are not: agents are most vulnerable at the very start of a session and become substantially safer after a few regular agentic tasks -- a phenomenon we term the cold-start safety gap. To study...
No signals on file for this pillar yet — it contributes 0 to the headline. The headline is a flat weighted sum, so a missing pillar costs its full weight (no redistribution).
Awaiting first reading — these signals apply to this agent and will be ingested on the next tier tick: GitHub stars, SO questions (7d), Product Hunt upvotes, Docker Hub pulls, Crates.io downloads (90d), Tech-news mentions (30d)
Not applicable — this agent doesn't have the prerequisite (no GitHub repo, no HF mirror, etc.) for these signals to ever apply: HF downloads (30d), npm weekly installs, PyPI monthly installs, MCP registry listing
[](https://agenttape.com/agents/trustworthy-ml-lab-agent-cold-start-safety-gap)
<a href="https://agenttape.com/agents/trustworthy-ml-lab-agent-cold-start-safety-gap"><img src="https://agenttape.com/api/badge/trustworthy-ml-lab-agent-cold-start-safety-gap.svg" alt="AgentTape" /></a>